# Zero Trust Access

**URL:** https://community.limacharlie.com/t/zero-trust-access/788
**Category:** Feature Requests
**Created:** [September 24, 2026, 8:04am UTC](https://community.limacharlie.com/t/zero-trust-access/788 "2026-09-24T08:04:17Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Timothy\_christ](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex033/user_avatar/community.limacharlie.com/timothy_christ/32/87_2.png) [@Timothy\_christ](https://community.limacharlie.com/u/Timothy_christ)
#### Post date: [September 24, 2026, 8:04am UTC](https://community.limacharlie.com/t/zero-trust-access/788/1 "2026-09-24T08:04:17Z")

</div>

With Jev from TypeSafe AI.

I think we can utilize it to run it against LC’s Raw Events, categorize them fast.

Creating a feature similar with ThreatLocker.

I’ve managed to set up a small test using LCQL and Jev, it managed to generate device and user based baseline after 7 days of monitoring-mode.

Just wondering, if LC team have thought of this feature or not, would be awesome! 🙌

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![maximelb](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex033/user_avatar/community.limacharlie.com/maximelb/32/13_2.png) [@maximelb](https://community.limacharlie.com/u/maximelb)
#### Post date: [September 24, 2026, 5:50pm UTC](https://community.limacharlie.com/t/zero-trust-access/788/2 "2026-09-24T17:50:14Z")

</div>

Funny you mention that, we’re also in the process of looking at binary whitelisting which I think would play really well with this.

Jev is super interesting and I encourage you to use it on your side, but it’s a bit more challenging for us to use it in the backend right now because geography and compliance.
